Wall Street & Technology is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Data Management

11:10 AM
Greg MacSweeney
Greg MacSweeney
Commentary
Connect Directly
Facebook
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Data Center Spending Is Simply Unsustainable

Financial firms spend millions to build data centers and then millions annually to continue running the facilities. A perfect storm of increasing costs and server underutilization and declining industry revenues are forcing firms to rethink their data center strategies.

The numbers are in, and no matter how you slice and dice the metrics, they don't look good. Whether it's the declining revenues of capital markets firms, the cost of energy or the underutilization of servers, the numbers do not paint a pretty picture for the future of the data center.

While there always will be a place for data centers in the financial services industry, the role of the traditional corporate data center is changing. Firms still can gain certain competitive advantages from maintaining and running their own data centers, such as latency reductions. And, in an industry that has collectively been under regulatory scrutiny for decades, firms still require top-flight security on customer and corporate data. (As the saying goes: You can't outsource security, risk and compliance oversight.)

But the cost to run a proprietary data center just to maintain security and competitive advantages for certain applications will soon become too much to bear -- if it hasn't become so already.

For starters, simply powering a data center filled with servers humming along 24 hours a day is extremely costly. A typical corporate data center consumes millions of watts of power, even if it isn't actually processing any data.

In fact, despite years of trying to get firms to increase their utilization of existing servers, most servers in data centers run at only 7 percent to 12 percent of capacity, according to separate studies from Gartner and McKinsey & Company, as reported in The New York Times. This means that most of the energy consumed -- between 88 percent and 97 percent -- is used to do things other than actually process data, such as cooling.

[The Death of the Data Center Has Been Greatly Exaggerated ]

Meanwhile, financial firms are pushing to reduce costs across all business units. It's no secret that technology budgets have been squeezed in recent years. But while most data centers are not being used to capacity, the costs to run them remain relatively fixed. And often data center executives are afraid to shut down underutilized servers for fear of losing their jobs -- just in case something goes wrong.

At the same time, many applications have moved to hosted offerings, either by software vendors or to purely cloud-based solutions, such as Salesforce.com. This leaves data center executives in a pickle: Where do the costs of running the data center get allocated? Most companies allocate data center costs to the business users who consume computing power. But if fewer users are actually running applications in the data center and the costs remain the same, the costs for the remaining users will increase. (Try telling that to your business partner: You will get the same service as last year, but it will cost you 20 percent more.)

This doesn't mean that data centers in financial services will disappear today, tomorrow or even by 2018. But unless firms figure out a way to control data center energy consumption, increase server utilization, and provide the features and flexibility that are driving many business users to the cloud in the first place, data centers as we know them today on Wall Street will shrink drastically over the next few years. It's simple economics: The numbers don't support the status quo.

Greg MacSweeney is editorial director of InformationWeek Financial Services, whose brands include Wall Street & Technology, Bank Systems & Technology, Advanced Trading, and Insurance & Technology. View Full Bio
More Commentary
A Wild Ride Comes to an End
Covering the financial services technology space for the past 15 years has been a thrilling ride with many ups as downs.
The End of an Era: Farewell to an Icon
After more than two decades of writing for Wall Street & Technology, I am leaving the media brand. It's time to reflect on our mutual history and the road ahead.
Beyond Bitcoin: Why Counterparty Has Won Support From Overstock's Chairman
The combined excitement over the currency and the Blockchain has kept the market capitalization above $4 billion for more than a year. This has attracted both imitators and innovators.
Asset Managers Set Sights on Defragmenting Back-Office Data
Defragmenting back-office data and technology will be a top focus for asset managers in 2015.
4 Mobile Security Predictions for 2015
As we look ahead, mobility is the perfect breeding ground for attacks in 2015.
Register for Wall Street & Technology Newsletters
Video
5 Things to Look For Before Accepting Terms & Conditions
5 Things to Look For Before Accepting Terms & Conditions
Is your corporate data at risk? Before uploading sensitive information to cloud services be sure to review these terms.