Wall Street & Technology is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Compliance

12:06 PM
Justin Grant
Justin Grant
Commentary
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Is the Volcker Rule on the Brink of Further Weakening?

Under guidelines set earlier this year by the Financial Stability Oversight Council, any position taken by a bank that isn't hedged completely can be considered proprietary trading, a practice that was banned by the Volcker Rule.

Under guidelines set earlier this year by the Financial Stability Oversight Council, any position taken by a bank that isn't hedged completely can be considered proprietary trading, a practice that was banned by the Volcker Rule.

Experts say that under FSOC's original guidelines, regulators would need to develop a mechanism that would track a trader's book to make sure their positions were always completely hedged.

But in recent months, regulators and banks have been haggling over how to define hedging under the new law. Now it appears that banks might have won their fight for a lenient interpretation of hedging, which would enable them to continue making risky, yet potentially profitable bets with their own capital according to a Wall Street Journal report.

The newspaper says the latest rule proposal opens the door for banks to make all sorts of bets in the marketplace.

From the WSJ:

The new language, contained in a 174-page draft proposal for the rule released to regulators in August and reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, says hedging can cover bank risk on a "portfolio basis," including "the aggregate risk of one or more trading desks." In effect, that opens the door for banks to make all manner of bets on the market, observers said, because a bank might define the risk to its portfolio broadly, such as the risk of a U.S. recession.

If the language is confirmed in the final rule, expected by late October, it would be a victory for Wall Street firms that have lobbied to relax the ban on proprietary trading.

Naturally this interpretation has folks throughout the industry pleased.

From WSJ:

"We think the portfolio approach is the way to go," said Rob Toomey, managing director at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. "It's the way people think about their hedging activity."

As the Senior Editor of Advanced Trading, Justin Grant plays a key role in steering the magazine's coverage of the latest issues affecting the buy-side trading community. Since joining Advanced Trading in 2010, Grant's news analysis has touched on everything from the latest ... View Full Bio
More Commentary
A Wild Ride Comes to an End
Covering the financial services technology space for the past 15 years has been a thrilling ride with many ups as downs.
The End of an Era: Farewell to an Icon
After more than two decades of writing for Wall Street & Technology, I am leaving the media brand. It's time to reflect on our mutual history and the road ahead.
Beyond Bitcoin: Why Counterparty Has Won Support From Overstock's Chairman
The combined excitement over the currency and the Blockchain has kept the market capitalization above $4 billion for more than a year. This has attracted both imitators and innovators.
Asset Managers Set Sights on Defragmenting Back-Office Data
Defragmenting back-office data and technology will be a top focus for asset managers in 2015.
4 Mobile Security Predictions for 2015
As we look ahead, mobility is the perfect breeding ground for attacks in 2015.
Register for Wall Street & Technology Newsletters
Video
Stressed Out by Compliance, Reputational Damage & Fines?
Stressed Out by Compliance, Reputational Damage & Fines?
Financial services executives are living in a "regulatory pressure cooker." Here's how executives are preparing for the new compliance requirements.